A novel predictor of unsustained return of spontaneous circulation in cardiac arrest patients through a combination of capnography and pulse oximetry: a multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Unsustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is a critical barrier to survival in cardiac arrest patients. This study examined whether end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and pulse oximetry photoplethysmogram (POP) parameters can be used to identify unsustained ROSC. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter observational prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with cardiac arrest from 2013 to 2014. Patients' general information, ETCO2, and POP parameters were collected and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The included 105 ROSC episodes (from 80 cardiac arrest patients) comprised 51 sustained ROSC episodes and 54 unsustained ROSC episodes. The 24-hour survival rate was significantly higher in the sustained ROSC group than in the unsustained ROSC group (29.2% vs. 9.4%, P<0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed that the difference between after and before ROSC in ETCO2 (ΔETCO2) and the difference between after and before ROCS in area under the curve of POP (ΔAUCp) were independently associated with sustained ROSC (odds ratio [OR]=0.931, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.881-0.984, P=0.011 and OR=0.998, 95% CI 0.997-0.999, P<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ΔETCO2, ΔAUCp, and the combination of both to predict unsustained ROSC were 0.752 (95% CI 0.660-0.844), 0.883 (95% CI 0.818-0.948), and 0.902 (95% CI 0.842-0.962), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with unsustained ROSC have a poor prognosis. The combination of ΔETCO2 and ΔAUCp showed significant predictive value for unsustained ROSC.

Pulse oximetry waveform: A non-invasive physiological predictor for the return of spontaneous circulation in cardiac arrest patients ---- A multicenter, prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of pulse oximetry plethysmography (POP) for the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in cardiac arrest (CA) patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with cardiac arrest at 14 teaching hospitals cross China from December 2013 through November 2014. The study endpoint was ROSC, defined as the restoration of a palpable pulse and an autonomous cardiac rhythm lasting for at least 20 minutes after the completion or cessation of CPR. RESULTS: 150 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients and 291 in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients were enrolled prospectively. ROSC was achieved in 20 (13.3%) and 64 (22.0%) patients in these cohorts, respectively. In patients with complete end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and POP data, patients with ROSC had significantly higher levels of POP area under the curve (AUCp), wave amplitude (Amp) and ETCO2 level during CPR than those without ROSC (all p < 0.05). Pairwise comparison of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated no significant difference was observed between ETCO2 and Amp (p = 0.204) or AUCp (p = 0.588) during the first two minutes of resuscitation. CONCLUSION: POP may be a novel and effective method for predicting ROSC during resuscitation, with a prognostic value similar to ETCO2 at early stage.

[Predictive value of continuous monitoring end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure on in-hospital resuscitation outcome: secondary analysis of the data from a multicenter observational study].

OBJECTIVE: To approach the predictive value of continuous monitoring end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2) on the outcome of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and explored the indicators of termination of resuscitation. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a multicenter observational study data was conducted. The screening aim was adult non-traumatic in-hospital CPR patients whose PETCO2 were recorded within 30 minutes of CPR. Clinical information was reviewed. The mean PETCO2 in restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and non-ROSC patients was recorded. The outcome of CPR was continuously assessed by PETCO2 ≤ 10 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) for 1, 3, 5, 8, 10 minutes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and the predictive value of PETCO2 ≤ 10 mmHg for different duration on the outcome of CPR was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 467 recovery patients, including 419 patients with complete recovery were screened. Patients who were out-of-hospital resuscitation, non-adults, traumatic injury, had no PETCO2 value, PETCO2 value failed to explained the clinical conditions, or patients had not monitored PETCO2 within 30 minutes of resuscitation were excluded, and finally 120 adult patients with non-traumatic in-hospital resuscitation were enrolled in the analysis. The mean PETCO2 in 50 patients with ROSC was significantly higher than that of 70 non-ROSC patients [mmHg: 17 (11, 27) vs. 9 (6, 16), P < 0.01]. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under ROC curve (AUC) of PETCO2 during the resuscitation for predicting recovery outcome was 0.712 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 0.689-0.735]; when the cut-off was 10.5 mmHg, the sensitivity was 57.8%, and the specificity was 78.0%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 84.6%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 46.9%. The duration of PETCO2 ≤ 10 mmHg was used for further analysis, which showed that with PETCO2 ≤10 mmHg in duration, the prediction of the sensitivity of the patients failed to recover decreased from 58.2% to 28.2%, but specificity increased from 39.4% to 100%; PPV increased from 40% to 100%, and NPV decreased from 57.5% to 34.2%. CONCLUSIONS: For adult non-traumatic in-hospital CPR patients, continuous 10 minutes PETCO2 ≤10 mmHg may be an indicate of termination of CPR.

[Experimental study on effect of airway pressure on cardiopulmonary resuscitation].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of different airway pressure on ventilation, organ perfusion and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of cardiac arrest (CA) pigs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and to explore the possible beneficial mechanism of positive airway pressure during CPR. METHODS: Twenty healthy landrace pigs of clean grade were divided into low airway pressure group (LP group, n = 10) and high airway pressure group (HP group, n = 10) with random number table. The model of ventricular fibrillation (VF) was reproduced by electrical stimulation, and mechanical chest compressions and mechanical ventilation (volume-controlled mode, tidal volume 7 mL/kg, frequency 10 times/min) were performed after 8 minutes of untreated VF. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in LP group and HP group was set to 0 cmH2O and 6 cmH2O (1 cmH2O = 0.098 kPa) respectively. Up to three times of 100 J biphasic defibrillation was delivered after 10 minutes of CPR. The ROSC of animals were observed, and the respiratory parameters, arterial and venous blood gas and hemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline, 5 minutes and 10 minutes of CPR. RESULTS: The number of animals with ROSC in the HP group was significantly more than that in the LP group (8 vs. 3, P < 0.05). Intrathoracic pressure during chest compression relaxation was negative in the HP group, and its absolute value was significantly lower than that in LP group at the same time [intrathoracic negative pressure peak (cmH2O): -4.7±2.2 vs. -10.8±3.5 at 5 minutes, -3.9±2.8 vs. -6.5±3.4 at 10 minutes], however, there was significantly difference only at 5 minutes of CPR (P < 0.01). Intrathoracic pressure variation during CPR period in the HP group were significantly higher than those in the LP group (cmH2O: 22.5±7.9 vs. 14.2±4.4 at 5 minutes, 23.1±6.4 vs. 12.9±5.1 at 10 minutes, both P < 0.01). Compared to the LP group, arterial partial pressure of oxygen [PaO2 (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 81.5±10.7 vs. 68.0±12.1], venous oxygen saturation (SvO2: 0.493±0.109 vs. 0.394±0.061) at 5 minutes of CPR, and PaO2 (mmHg: 77.5±13.4 vs. 63.3±10.5), arterial pH (7.28±0.09 vs 7.23±0.11), SvO2 (0.458±0.096 vs. 0.352±0.078), aortic blood pressure [AoP (mmHg): 39.7±9.5 vs. 34.0±6.9], coronary perfusion pressure [CPP (mmHg): 25.2±9.6 vs. 19.0±7.6], and carotid artery flow (mL/min: 44±16 vs. 37±14) at 10 minutes of CPR in the HP group were significantly higher (all P < 0.05). Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) in the HP group was significantly lower than that in the LP group at 10 minutes of CPR (mmHg: 60.1±9.7 vs. 67.8±8.6, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to low airway pressure, a certain degree of positive airway pressure can still maintain the negative intrathoracic pressure during relaxation of chest compressions of CPR, while increase the degree of intrathoracic pressure variation. Positive airway pressure can improve oxygenation and hemodynamics during CPR, and is helpful to ROSC.

Comparison of different inspiratory triggering settings in automated ventilators during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation via automated in-hospital ventilators is quite common during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. It is not known whether different inspiratory triggering sensitivity settings of ordinary ventilators have different effects on actual ventilation, gas exchange and hemodynamics during resuscitation. METHODS: 18 pigs enrolled in this study were anaesthetized and intubated. Continuous chest compressions and mechanical ventilation (volume-controlled mode, 100% O2, respiratory rate 10/min, and tidal volumes 10ml/kg) were performed after 3 minutes of ventricular fibrillation. Group trig-4, trig-10 and trig-20 (six pigs each) were characterized by triggering sensitivities of 4, 10 and 20 (cmH2O for pressure-triggering and L/min for flow-triggering), respectively. Additionally, each pig in each group was mechanically ventilated using three types of inspiratory triggering (pressure-triggering, flow-triggering and turned-off triggering) of 5 minutes duration each, and each animal matched with one of six random assortments of the three different triggering settings. Blood gas samples, respiratory and hemodynamic parameters for each period were all collected and analyzed. RESULTS: In each group, significantly lower actual respiratory rate, minute ventilation volume, mean airway pressure, arterial pH, PaO2, and higher end-tidal carbon dioxide, aortic blood pressure, coronary perfusion pressure, PaCO2 and venous oxygen saturation were observed in the ventilation periods with a turned-off triggering setting compared to those with pressure- or flow- triggering (all P<0.05), except when compared with pressure-triggering of 20 cmH2O (respiratory rate 10.5[10/11.3]/min vs 12.5[10.8/13.3]/min, P = 0.07; coronary perfusion pressure 30.3[24.5/31.6] mmHg vs 27.4[23.7/29] mmHg, P = 0.173; venous oxygen saturation 46.5[32/56.8]% vs 41.5[33.5/48.5]%, P = 0.575). CONCLUSIONS: Ventilation with pressure- or flow-triggering tends to induce hyperventilation and deteriorating gas exchange and hemodynamics during CPR. A turned-off patient triggering or a pressure-triggering of 20 cmH2O is preferred for ventilation when an ordinary inpatient hospital ventilator is used during resuscitation.

[The effect of blood volume change on the accuracy of pulse contour cardiac output].

OBJECTIVE: To study the accuracy of pulse contour cardiac output (PCCO) during blood volume change. METHODS: Hemorrhagic shock model was made in twenty dogs followed by volume resuscitation. Two PiCCO catheters were placed into each model to monitor the cardiac output (CO). One of catheters was used to calibrate CO by transpulmonary thermodilution technique (COTP) (calibration group), and the other one was used to calibrate PCCO (none-calibration group). In the hemorrhage phase, calibration was carried out each time when the blood volume dropped by 5 percents in the calibration group until the hemorrhage volume reached to 40 percent of the basic blood volume. Continuous monitor was done in the none-calibration group.Volume resuscitation phase started after re-calibration in the two groups. Calibration was carried out each time when the blood equivalent rose by 5 percents in calibration group until the percentage of blood equivalent volume returned back to 100. Continuous monitor was done in none-calibration group. COTP, PCCO, mean arterial pressure (MAP), systemic circulation resistance (SVR), global enddiastolic volume (GEDV) were recorded respectively in each time point. RESULTS: (1) At the baseline, COTP in calibration group showed no statistic difference compared with PCCO in none-calibration group (P >0.05). (2) In the hemorrhage phase, COTP and GEDV in calibration group decreased gradually, and reached to the minimum value (1.06 ± 0.57) L/min, (238 ± 93) ml respectively at TH8. SVR in calibration group increased gradually, and reached to the maximum value (5 074 ± 2 342) dyn · s · cm⁻5 at TH6. However, PCCO and SVR in none-calibration group decreased in a fluctuating manner, and reached to the minimum value (2.42 ± 1.37) L/min, (2 285 ± 1 033) dyn · s · cm⁻5 respectively at TH8. COTP in the calibration group showed a significant statistic difference compared with PCCO in the none-calibration group at each time point (At TH1-8, t values were respectively -5.218, -5.495, -4.639, -6.588, -6.029, -5.510, -5.763 and -5.755, all P < 0.01). From TH1 to TH8, the difference in percentage increased gradually. There were statistic differences in SVR at each time point between the two groups (At TH1 and TH4, t values were respectively 2.866 and 2.429, both P < 0.05, at TH2 - TH3 and TH5 - TH8, t values were respectively 3.073, 3.590, 6.847, 8.425, 6.910 and 8.799, all P < 0.01). There was no statistic difference in MAP between the two groups (P > 0.05). (3) In the volume resuscitation phase, COTP and GEDV in the calibration group increased gradually. GEDV reached to the maximum value ((394±133) ml) at TR7, and COTP reached to the maximum value (3.15 ± 1.42) L/min at TR8. SVR in the calibration group decreased gradually, and reached to the minimum value (3 284 ± 1 271) dyn · s · cm⁻5 at TR8. However, PCCO and SVR in the none-calibration group increased in a fluctuating manner. SVR reached to the maximum value (8 589 ± 4 771) dyn · s · cm⁻5 at TR7, and PCCO reached to the maximum value (1.35 ± 0.70) L/min at TR8. COTP in the calibration group showed a significant statistic difference compared with PCCO in the none-calibration group at each time point (At TR1-8, t values were respectively 8.195, 8.703, 7.903, 8.266, 9.600, 8.340, 8.938, 8.332, all P < 0.01). From TR1 to TR8, the difference in percentage increased gradually. There were statistic differences in SVR at each time point between the two groups (At TR1, t value was -2.810, P < 0.05, at TR2-8, t values were respectively -6.026, -6.026, -5.375, -6.008, -5.406, -5.613 and -5.609, all P < 0.05). There was no statistic difference in MAP between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PCCO could not reflect the real CO in case of rapid blood volume change, which resulting in the misjudgment of patient's condition. In clinical practice, more frequent calibrations should be done to maintain the accuracy of PCCO in rapid blood volume change cases.